Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you, Andrew. This is…
davo:
Andrew, thanks for…
Andrew:
I doubt I will ever read the…
X. József:
You are right to fault the…
Evalsam:
Please reply to this “reply”…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10145
Did Jesus claim to be God?
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
I still have to ask the
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
What I object to is the
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
I agree with your
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I strongly disagree that “son
JT John Tancock → Andrew
:
AndrewI will continue a
Andrew → JT john Tancock
:
In Psalms of Solomon (1st
Jesus is God or Jesus is Lord?
Andrew → Daniel
:
I’ll have a look at it.
cherylu → Andrew
:
Andrew, did you notice that
cherylu → Andrew
:
I really wish my comments
Andrew → cherylu
:
I don’t quite see the
JT John Tancock → cherylu
:
eek ok lol!!! Jst felt we
cherylu → 'JT' John Tancock
:
John,Thanks for the
cherylu → Andrew
:
“but as he who called you is
'JT' John Tancock → Eric
:
Eric (and Andrew) I don’t
'JT' John Tancock → cherylu
:
CheryluWd love to have a chat
Eric → Andrew
:
Andrew, thanks for posting.
Andrew → cherylu
:
As far as I can see, Cherylu,
Daniel → Andrew
:
Andrew,Have you read any of
cherylu → Andrew
:
Andrew, I think if you carry
cherylu → Andrew
:
What about sinlessness? Can
JT John Tancock → Andrew
:
Not convoluted at all. Its
Andrew → cherylu
:
Thanks. I’d missed that. But
cherylu → Andrew
:
Andrew,I thought I answered
Andrew → cherylu
:
My question to you would be:
JT John Tancock → cherylu
:
Cherylu……do contact me!!
cherylu → cherylu
:
Just one more thought or
Andrew → JT john Tancock
:
Also a mainstream ‘high’
cherylu → Andrew
:
I must say that you tend to
John Doyle → JT john Tancock
:
Empiricist nit-picker! ;)
JT john Tancock → Andrew
:
OK here goes Andrew…… My
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
229
Page
230
Page
231
Page
232
Page
233
Page
234
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments