Recent comments

Comments found: 10225

The coming of the Son of Man: theology or history?

Ian Paul → davo: This seems really odd to me
davo → Andrew: For mine… I think it makes
Ed babinski → Andrew: Nice article, I agree the
Andrew → peter wilkinson: This is not putting all my
peter wilkinson → Andrew: To place all your theological
Ian Paul → Andrew: Another minor exegetical
Ian Paul → Ian Paul: Oh and he used to point out
Ian Paul → Andrew: Yes, absolutely. He has an
Andrew → Ian Paul: I haven’t come across France
Ian Paul → Andrew: Thanks for this clear

What’s wrong with the “Romans Road” to salvation?

Penguin → Andrew: I think if you’re going to

Jesus is God or Jesus is Lord?

JT John Tancock → Jaco: neither rash (I have a
Jaco → BradK: Aah, I hear you, BradK. I
BradK → Jaco van Zyl: I don’t necessarily disagree,
Jaco van Zyl → BradK: BradK, I hear you and I agree
BradK → JT John Tancock: John Tancock’s question about
Jaco → JT John Tancock: Another rash and short
Jaco → JT John Tancock: Another rash and short
Jaco → JT John Tancock: Your highlighting Dunn and
JT John Tancock → Jaco: just had a quick look at Pery
JT John Tancock → Jaco: So many replies! I am away
Jaco → Andrew: I recently replied to Dan
Jaco → 'JT' John Tancock: Lord is certainly not by
Jaco → 'JT' John Tancock: None of the texts you cite
Jaco → JT John Tancock: So what if Dunn and McGrath

Good Friday: the death of Jesus in narrative-historical context

Andrew → peter wilkinson: I argue that it breaks open
Bill → Andrew: Well written and very
peter wilkinson → Andrew: What seems to me so
John Doyle → Andrew: Regarding the possibility if
Mark Nieweg → Andrew: Hello Andrew,As Rob states
Subscribe to Recent comments