Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you Andrew. Perhaps…
Ron Macy:
Don’t forget the most direct…
Ron Macy:
Peter Wilkinson, I apologize…
Jerry:
Satan’s little season and…
Alpha Kamara:
Your illustration says it…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10182
Good Friday: the death of Jesus in narrative-historical context
Doug Wilkinson → Andrew
:
I’m glad to see a reference
cherylu → Andrew
:
Andrew, you said, “The
Did Jesus claim to be God?
JT John Tancock → Andrew
:
Theres me thinking we were
cherylu → peter wilkinson
:
You know, I am starting to
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
It’s amazing how much debate
cherylu → cherylu
:
Andrew, I just want to add a
cherylu → Andrew
:
How about substituting the
Andrew → JT John Tancock
:
Never heard of the guy.
Andrew → cherylu
:
The Apostles’ Creed does a
JT John Tancock → Andrew
:
Ok I can ‘pause’ until some
cherylu → Andrew
:
Andrew,I really have to
JT john Tancock → Andrew
:
at risk of repetition..
Andrew → JT john Tancock
:
That second paragraph rather
Andrew → JT john Tancock
:
I think that amply
JT john Tancock → Andrew
:
not high enough Andrew.
JT john Tancock → Andrew
:
This ‘fourth century’ stuff
JT john Tancock → Andrew
:
The pre existence issue is so
JT john Tancock → Andrew
:
Yes the Spirit is but thats
cherylu → Andrew
:
So, as you see it, the GreeK
Andrew → cherylu
:
No, I wouldn’t see it as new
cherylu → Andrew
:
As I was thinking more about
cherylu → Andrew
:
Thanks for deleting the
Andrew → 'JT' John Tancock
:
There is a simple and
Andrew → cherylu
:
I’m terribly sorry, Cherylu,
'JT' John Tancock → Andrew
:
By NT I think you in practise
cherylu → Andrew
:
Thanks for your answer,
Andrew → cherylu
:
What I think is something
Andrew → JT john Tancock
:
The way in which they talked
JT john Tancock → Andrew
:
It IS necessary to read the
Andrew → JT john Tancock
:
The range of greek
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
229
Page
230
Page
231
Page
232
Page
233
Page
234
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments