Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you, Andrew. This is…
davo:
Andrew, thanks for…
Andrew:
I doubt I will ever read the…
X. József:
You are right to fault the…
Evalsam:
Please reply to this “reply”…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10145
Jesus is God or Jesus is Lord?
JT john Tancock → John Doyle
:
Johnmisquoting the text
John Doyle → Andrew
:
Commit him then to the flames
JT john Tancock → Andrew
:
Some comments I have made on
Andrew → 'JT' John Tancock
:
To work within the
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Quite who Jesus is in your
Andrew → cherylu
:
Cherylu, it’s nice to hear
'JT' John Tancock → Andrew
:
Just a brief comment Andrew….
cherylu → BradK
:
Hi Brad,You have asked a
'JT' John Tancock → 'JT' John Tancock
:
On LORD.WE don’t need Lord?
'JT' John Tancock → peter wilkinson
:
Well I’m sort of honoured to
BradK → cherylu
:
Cheryl, while we wait for
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
http://postost.net/2012/04
cherylu → Andrew
:
Hi Andrew,Yes, I still read
Did Jesus claim to be God?
JT john Tancock → Andrew
:
Ok lets have a look at these
Andrew → JT John Tancock
:
Here’s what you said:No OT
JT John Tancock → Andrew
:
FATHERI don’t find the
Andrew → JT John Tancock
:
I can’t back this up at the
Andrew → JT John Tancock
:
However ‘Biblical
JT John Tancock → peter wilkinson
:
Ah Andrew , for the sake of
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
It’s a good point about
JT John Tancock → JT John Tancock
:
continued…sorryBut those
JT John Tancock → Andrew
:
Thanks Andrew, yes I
Andrew → JT John Tancock
:
I understand your concerns.
JT John Tancock → Andrew
:
This identity of God people
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
The first point will depend
Andrew → JT John Tancock
:
John, thank you for
JT John Tancock → peter wilkinson
:
very insightful point Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Purely because I saw J T John
JT John Tancock → JT John Tancock
:
also re Heb 1why ‘doubt’ v8
New creation, Spirit, blessing and kingdom: a clarification of terminology
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Yet another interruption
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
230
Page
231
Page
232
Page
233
Page
234
Page
235
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments