Recent comments

Comments found: 10225

Wright and White on the “righteousness of God” in 2 Corinthians 5:21

Jon → Andrew: dsSSClaSo for clarification
Andrew → peter wilkinson: …much that he says is no less
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Just a couple of comments on

Jesus is God or Jesus is Lord?

JT John Tancock → cherylu: I so agree Cherylu, in fact
cherylu → Andrew: Hi Andrew,“that we are wound
JT John Tancock → Andrew: I do understand Andrew, got
Andrew → Jaco van Zyl: I’m not trying to suppress
JT John Tancock → Andrew: AndrewOk no problem. here
Jaco van Zyl → Andrew: Aah, would have loved to
Andrew → JT John Tancock: How about we call it a day on
JT John Tancock → JT john Tancock: The booklet was actually
JT john Tancock → cherylu: Hipplolytus says it so better
JT john Tancock → BradK: The semantic range of
JT john Tancock → Jaco: So many of your comments are
cherylu → Jaco van Zyl: Jaco,But we are discussing
cherylu → cherylu: Also from Hippolytus: ” Now,
Jaco van Zyl → cherylu: Cheryl, I could answer you,
cherylu → Jaco: Hi Jaco,I am familiar with
BradK → JT John Tancock: John, regarding the issue of
Jaco → Andrew: John Tancock,“So Jesus is
JT John Tancock → JT John Tancock: Here is the actual resources
JT John Tancock → Jaco: JacoIf you re read your own
JT John Tancock → Jaco: Great link Cherylu. Now if
Jaco → JT John Tancock: John Tancock,I am of course

The coming of the Son of Man: theology or history?

Rich → Andrew: Andrew,I think these words
Ian Paul → BradK: As a scholar of Revelation, I
BradK → peter wilkinson: “-there is no mention of the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Although I said in an earlier

He is near, at the doors

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Because it’s possibly
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Just to atone for my
Subscribe to Recent comments