Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you, Andrew. This is…
davo:
Andrew, thanks for…
Andrew:
I doubt I will ever read the…
X. József:
You are right to fault the…
Evalsam:
Please reply to this “reply”…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10145
Jesus as Lord in Mark
Andrew → Ed Dingess
:
Since this is supposed to be
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
ὃς ἐν μορφῇ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων, who
cherylu → Andrew
:
Andrew,At this point time
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
…neither was ‘Lord’ as a
Andrew → Ed Dingess
:
Ed, I’ve lumped together
peter wilkinson → peter wilkinson
:
The comment I just posted
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
John was not speaking of a
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
I have a high view of
cherylu → Ed Dingess
:
Ed,FYI, the John 1:1 passage
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
There is another problem with
Andrew → Ed Dingess
:
Fundamental to evangelicalism
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
The statements in John to
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
It is then just plain common
Andrew → Ed Dingess
:
I don’t particularly regard
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
I am simply trying to be as
Andrew → Ed Dingess
:
I do not know how long the
Ed Dingess → Ed Dingess
:
“Only if Andrew can show that
Ed Dingess → cherylu
:
Hi Cherylu,This is why I want
cherylu → Ed Dingess
:
Hi Ed,Thanks for that comment
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
A brief comment about method:
Andrew → cherylu
:
But I then went on to say,
cherylu → Andrew
:
“It’s an astute comment, and
Andrew → cherylu
:
But in this case, you are
Andrew → cherylu
:
Cherylu, I appreciate the
cherylu → Andrew
:
“The quotations from Isaiah
cherylu → Andrew
:
Thanks, Andrew.You know,
Andrew → cherylu
:
Thank you. Fixed. Chapter 7.
cherylu → Andrew
:
Andrew,What chapter are you
Andrew → cherylu
:
And you know, I can not see
cherylu → Andrew
:
Andrew,I don’t know if I can
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
221
Page
222
Page
223
Page
224
Page
225
Page
226
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments