Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you Andrew. Perhaps…
Ron Macy:
Don’t forget the most direct…
Ron Macy:
Peter Wilkinson, I apologize…
Jerry:
Satan’s little season and…
Alpha Kamara:
Your illustration says it…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10182
Jesus as Lord in Mark
Ed Dingess → Jaco
:
This is what I mean Jaco. You
Jaco → cherylu
:
Hi CherylWhat if what Ed said
Jaco → Ed Dingess
:
Ed Dingess, I have no
Ed Dingess → Jaco
:
οὗτος occurs 55 times in John
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
I do not discount the value
Andrew → Ed Dingess
:
Can we really trust the
Ed Dingess → Jaco
:
You do realize that Alford is
cherylu → Jaco
:
Jaco,What if what Ed said is
Jaco → Ed Dingess
:
Nothing concrete to add, Ed?
Ed Dingess → Jaco
:
Hi Jaco,I read your response
Jaco → Ed Dingess
:
Hi EdMost your thoughts
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
One final comment about
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
Hi Andrew,John 1:1-18 is
Andrew → Mark Nieweg
:
I’ve attempted to address
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
That is exactly what Daniel 7
cherylu → Andrew
:
I’m sorry, but this statement
cherylu → Andrew
:
And for the record, Andrew,
Andrew → cherylu
:
I didn’t say that one story
cherylu → Andrew
:
But Andrew, if one “story”
Andrew → cherylu
:
At risk of oversimplification
cherylu → Andrew
:
Andrew,You made this comment
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
The point is that Paul wants
Wright and the divinity of Jesus
Mike Gantt → Jaco
:
“…A good understanding have
Jaco → William Jordan
:
I think it is a very
Andrew → William Jordan
:
William, thanks for this
William Jordan → Andrew
:
While it is true that
What’s wrong with the “Romans Road” to salvation?
Dale → Andrew
:
Andrew, I appreciate your
Christendom: fulfilment or false start?
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Abraham Heschel’s “theology
What about 1 Corinthians 1:30? Nope, no imputation of righteousness here either. So where is it then?
Doug Wilkinson → peter wilkinson
:
Both the article and Peter’s
The symbolism of the Son of man coming on the clouds and the meaning of kingdom
Cassie → Rich
:
Hello Brother Rich,I thank
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
221
Page
222
Page
223
Page
224
Page
225
Page
226
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments