Recent comments

Comments found: 10182

Jesus as Lord in Mark

Ed Dingess → Jaco: This is what I mean Jaco. You
Jaco → Ed Dingess: Ed Dingess, I have no
Ed Dingess → Andrew: I do not discount the value
Andrew → Ed Dingess: Can we really trust the
Ed Dingess → Jaco: You do realize that Alford is
Jaco → Ed Dingess: Nothing concrete to add, Ed?
Ed Dingess → Jaco: Hi Jaco,I read your response
Jaco → Ed Dingess: Hi EdMost your thoughts
Ed Dingess → Andrew: One final comment about
Ed Dingess → Andrew: Hi Andrew,John 1:1-18 is
Andrew → Mark Nieweg: I’ve attempted to address
peter wilkinson → Andrew: That is exactly what Daniel 7
cherylu → Andrew: And for the record, Andrew,
Andrew → cherylu: I didn’t say that one story
cherylu → Andrew: But Andrew, if one “story”
Andrew → cherylu: At risk of oversimplification
cherylu → Andrew: Andrew,You made this comment
Andrew → peter wilkinson: The point is that Paul wants

Wright and the divinity of Jesus

Mike Gantt → Jaco: “…A good understanding have
Jaco → William Jordan: I think it is a very
Andrew → William Jordan: William, thanks for this
William Jordan → Andrew: While it is true that

What’s wrong with the “Romans Road” to salvation?

Dale → Andrew: Andrew, I appreciate your

Christendom: fulfilment or false start?

peter wilkinson → Andrew: Abraham Heschel’s “theology

What about 1 Corinthians 1:30? Nope, no imputation of righteousness here either. So where is it then?

Doug Wilkinson → peter wilkinson: Both the article and Peter’s

The symbolism of the Son of man coming on the clouds and the meaning of kingdom