Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

Wright and the divinity of Jesus

Jaco → William Jordan: I think it is a very
Andrew → William Jordan: William, thanks for this
William Jordan → Andrew: While it is true that

Jesus as Lord in Mark

Ed Dingess → Andrew: Hi Andrew,John 1:1-18 is
Andrew → Mark Nieweg: I’ve attempted to address
peter wilkinson → Andrew: That is exactly what Daniel 7
cherylu → Andrew: I’m sorry, but this statement
cherylu → Andrew: And for the record, Andrew,
Andrew → cherylu: I didn’t say that one story
cherylu → Andrew: But Andrew, if one “story”
Andrew → cherylu: At risk of oversimplification
cherylu → Andrew: Andrew,You made this comment
Andrew → peter wilkinson: The point is that Paul wants
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Hurtado writes:
peter wilkinson → Andrew: So what was the point of Paul
peter wilkinson → Andrew: …in the light of up to date
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Your word study does not
Andrew → Ed Dingess: I think this has probably got
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Philippians 2:10-11 actually
Ed Dingess → Andrew: Hi Andrew,You are forcing a
Andrew → Ed Dingess: Since this is supposed to be
Ed Dingess → Andrew: ὃς ἐν μορφῇ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων, who
cherylu → Andrew: Andrew,At this point time
Andrew → peter wilkinson: …neither was ‘Lord’ as a
Andrew → Ed Dingess: Ed, I’ve lumped together
peter wilkinson → peter wilkinson: The comment I just posted
peter wilkinson → Andrew: John was not speaking of a
Ed Dingess → Andrew: I have a high view of

What about 1 Corinthians 1:30? Nope, no imputation of righteousness here either. So where is it then?

Doug Wilkinson → peter wilkinson: Both the article and Peter’s

The symbolism of the Son of man coming on the clouds and the meaning of kingdom

Cassie → Rich: Hello Brother Rich,I thank
Subscribe to Recent comments