Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you, Andrew. This is…
davo:
Andrew, thanks for…
Andrew:
I doubt I will ever read the…
X. József:
You are right to fault the…
Evalsam:
Please reply to this “reply”…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10145
The battle between theology and history for the soul of the church: 24 antitheses
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I was reading the first point
Jesus as Lord in Mark
Jaco → Ed Dingess
:
It’s been fascinating, as
Mark Nieweg → cherylu
:
Hi Cherylu, It becomes sort
Jaco → JT
:
JT, I am not on the “outside.
Jaco → cherylu
:
Aah, you got it, Cheryl.
cherylu → Mark Nieweg
:
Thanks for the response and
cherylu → Ed Dingess
:
Ed,But unless I am
cherylu → Ed Dingess
:
Ed,But unless I am
Andrew → Ed Dingess
:
Your rule is imposing Philo
JT → Andrew
:
AndrewI have had the
Mark Nieweg → cherylu
:
Hi Cherylu,You are correct in
Ed Dingess → Jaco
:
Jaco,Lets be clear once more.
Ed Dingess → cherylu
:
That is correct. I recognize
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
cherylu → Andrew
:
Part of my concern, Andrew,
Andrew → Jaco van Zyl
:
Please don’t get off on the
Andrew → Scott
:
I agree, but this can be
BradK → peter wilkinson
:
I don’t think it holds good,
Scott → cherylu
:
Cheryl -The first 11 chapters
Andrew → cherylu
:
You have 11 chapters in
Rich → cherylu
:
Cherylu,Don’t get me wrong.
Jaco van Zyl → peter wilkinson
:
I think Andrew has a good
cherylu → Rich
:
Rich,My point is that if we
Rich → cherylu
:
Cherylu,That is an over
cherylu → Rich
:
I hardly think one can
Rich → cherylu
:
Cherylu,I picked up on that
cherylu → Andrew
:
Andrew,I have wondered before
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
A very helpful and lucid
A hymn of praise to the anti-Caesar
Ed Dingess → Jaco
:
In addition, I am not sure
Ed Dingess → Jaco
:
The debate is not over
Jaco → Ed Dingess
:
This is most certainly a much
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
216
Page
217
Page
218
Page
219
Page
220
Page
221
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments