Recent comments

Comments found: 10145

Adam, original sin, and wrath against the Jew

Pete Enns → Andrew: Largely the syntax of v. 7.
Andrew → Pete Enns: But why is it to obvious that
Pete Enns → Andrew: I agree all of this is a side
Andrew → Pete Enns: Peter, thanks, that’s a
Pete Enns → Andrew: I appreciate your thoughts
Andrew → Rich: Rich, if you don’t mind me
Rich → Andrew: But what of the sin before

The Lord said to my lord...

Andrew → peter wilkinson: But I am arguing that the
Jaco van Zyl → peter wilkinson: Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Thanks for your correction to
Andrew → JT: John, just to be clear, the
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Could you explain what you
JT → peter wilkinson: Andrewsreply reinforces the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Thanks for your various
peter wilkinson → Andrew: It’s entirely plausible to
Rich → JT: “1. Did Jesus in his pre
Andrew → JT: I cannot see what your
JT → Andrew: I will repeat again that I
Andrew → JT: John, all I am doing is
JT → JT: Just a few additional
JT → Andrew: AndrewMy problems with your
Andrew → JT: John, your comment
JT → Andrew: AndrewIt would be easy to
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Once the perspective of two
Andrew → peter wilkinson: The answer is implied in the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: You assume that there is a

The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology

Ed Dingess → Andrew: http://reformedreasons
Ed Dingess → Andrew: A post outlining my concerns

Rob Bell: What we don’t talk about when we talk about God

Andrew → John Doyle: Brilliant, John, though it’s
John Doyle → Andrew: Modernity is all about the
Subscribe to Recent comments