Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Andrew:
With regard to non…
Andrew:
My previous comment…
Andrew:
Right. I don’t think we see…
Tim Peebles:
My previous comments raised…
Tim Peebles:
As a Neo-Anabaptist, my…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Why you should get some theological (by which I really mean biblical) education
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10225
The Gospel Coalition gets the gospel back to front
Brian Considine → Andrew
:
Andrew, I am afraid you are
Andrew → Brian Considine
:
Brian, thanks for taking the
Brian Considine → Andrew
:
Andrew, thanks for your
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
I provide a brief response to
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Apologies again. For some
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Apologies; my previous
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Romans 10:3-4?
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
The most obvious problem with
Ed Dingess → Andrew
:
That fact of divine
Ed Dingess → Rebecca Trotter
:
Rebecca,Turn your smoking gun
Andrew → rob
:
Wasn’t the point of Jesus
rob → Andrew
:
Andrew, thanks for your reply
Andrew → Brian Considine
:
Brian, I resonate with much
Andrew → Dave G.
:
I’m not saying that there
Dave G. → Andrew
:
Well, if you look at the
Andrew → Alan K
:
Alan, in his letters Paul
Andrew → Rob Hutton
:
Rob, thanks, I value your
Alan K → Andrew
:
Is not the whole New
Brian Considine → Andrew
:
While I enjoyed the article,
Rob Hutton → Andrew
:
Hi Andrew, I’m cautious about
Andrew → Larry Chouinard
:
Larry, I agree with the
Andrew → Rebecca Trotter
:
Sharply put, Rebecca. I am
Rebecca Trotter → Andrew
:
What I think makes this
Larry Chouinard → Andrew
:
Paul’s language of new
Rob Bell: What we don’t talk about when we talk about God
Andrew → Daniel
:
See The Gospel Coalition gets
Misreading the parable of the minas from the post-Christendom margins
Stephen → Andrew
:
Does it make sense to say
Andrew → Stephen
:
OK, I see what you’re getting
Stephen → Stephen
:
Had another thought regarding
Stephen → Andrew
:
It’s possible I didn’t create
Andrew → Stephen
:
That seems a bit unlikely to
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
211
Page
212
Page
213
Page
214
Page
215
Page
216
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Why you should get some theological (by which I really mean biblical) education
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments