Recent comments

Comments found: 10115

The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me? Part 1

Andrew → Mike Gantt: I’m not sure I see your
Mike Gantt → Andrew: Andrew,
Doug in CO → Andrew: I think the weak part in your
Andrew → Mike Gantt: Mike, this post was written
Mike Gantt → Andrew: There is much that I like

What I think Romans is about

peter wilkinson → BradK: I’m sorry to have boggled
BradK → peter wilkinson: Peter, considering how much
Andrew → Steven Opp: Steven, I skimmed through
peter wilkinson → Andrew: It’s not a disconnection
Andrew → peter wilkinson: I see, thank you. But these
Steven Opp → Andrew: Hey Andrew,  
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I thought I was doing just
Andrew → Rob: Thanks, Rob. It’s nice to be
Andrew → peter wilkinson: There are gaping holes in it.
peter wilkinson → Andrew:  
Rob → Andrew: Thanks Andrew for your
Andrew → peter wilkinson: In the latter, the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I certainly still believe
Andrew → peter wilkinson: And my relevant question is:
Daniel → peter wilkinson: By protecting NT texts so
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Apologies Andrew, and before
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Andrew - you say:

Wright and the divinity of Jesus

Caleb → Jaco: Dear Jaco,
Mike Gantt → Jaco: Jaco,
Jaco → writer42: Writer42, thank you for your
Jaco → RobertH: “I hope this doesn’t sound
Jaco → Mike Gantt: Mike,

What’s wrong with the “Romans Road” to salvation?

Keith Wansbrough → Andrew: Thanks Andrew - this is great
Steven Opp → Andrew: Thanks Andrew, these have

Brian LePort's ten most difficult doctrinal/theological issues

Brian LePort → Andrew: Andrew,
Subscribe to Recent comments