Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

At the risk of repeating myself...

Rich → Andrew: Andrew,
Chris → Andrew: Andrew,
Andrew → peter wilkinson: I have made the point often
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I don’t see how sin in any
Yinka → Andrew: Ha ! A new banner added for

Wright and the divinity of Jesus

writer42 → Mike Gantt: Mike Gantt,
Mike Gantt → writer42: writer42, 
writer42 → Mike Gantt: Andrew Perriman
Mike Gantt → Andrew: Just because Jesus was not
Andrew → writer42: Paul is in a pagan context
writer42 → Andrew: Andrew Perriman,
writer42 → RobertH: RobertH
RobertH → writer42: I think the verses mentioned

The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me? Part 1

What was God's "eternal purpose"?

Andrew → Mike Gantt: I’m quite happy to insist
Mike Gantt → Andrew: Could it be that the eternal
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I think “political-spiritual”
Andrew → peter wilkinson: You may think it’s about
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Thanks Andrew. I sometimes
Justin vR → peter wilkinson: Peter,
Andrew → peter wilkinson: In the passage immediately
peter wilkinson → Andrew: In the passage immediately

Bebbington, Viola, and the redefinition of evangelicalism

Frank Viola → Andrew: The bit about the Eternal
Andrew → Frank Viola: Thanks, Frank. Nice to hear
Frank Viola → Andrew: Thanks for the shout-out.

Is the promise of the narrative-historical approach real or illusory?

Russ Herald → Doug in CO: “Maybe it’s time we get used
Doug in CO → Andrew: It seems to me that the drift
Yinka → Nan Bush: Nan said it !

The sinlessness of Jesus

writer42 → peter wilkinson: What about John 8:46? “Can