Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Lee:
Nerva is recorded as the…
Lee:
Consider that IN HIS Olivet…
Elliot:
I do wonder why paul would…
Elliot:
Hi Andrew, so would you…
Thomas Howard:
Luke’s genealogy shows that…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10167
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what's in it for me? Part 2
Rob → peter wilkinson
:
Very helpful series Andrew.
Andrew → Gerry
:
Gerry, I don’t think being
Mark Nieweg → Doug in CO
:
Hi Doug. I recall you had
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I appreciate that you are
Gerry → Andrew
:
Thanks for this great post. I
Doug in CO → Andrew
:
Your point sounds very much
Brian MacArevey → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Wright and the divinity of Jesus
Jaco → Caleb
:
Dear Caleb
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me? Part 1
Gerry → peter wilkinson
:
Its is a really interesting
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Maybe I was being rather
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
I don’t see what is so
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I don’t regard the statement
Mike Gantt → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Andrew → Mike Gantt
:
Mike, I really think you’re
Mike Gantt → Andrew
:
We can be glad that the
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
I don’t regard the statement
Justin vR → peter wilkinson
:
Hi Peter,
Mike Gantt → peter wilkinson
:
“…your narrative historical
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I anticipate reading the
Mike Gantt → Andrew
:
It sounded like you thought
Andrew → Mike Gantt
:
I’m not sure I see your
Mike Gantt → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Doug in CO → Andrew
:
I think the weak part in your
Andrew → Mike Gantt
:
Mike, this post was written
Mike Gantt → Andrew
:
There is much that I like
What’s wrong with the “Romans Road” to salvation?
Andrew → hamilton
:
Hamilton, thank you for
hamilton → Andrew
:
I am sorry, but I can not
What I think Romans is about
peter wilkinson → BradK
:
I’m sorry to have boggled
BradK → peter wilkinson
:
Peter, considering how much
Andrew → Steven Opp
:
Steven, I skimmed through
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
260
Page
261
Page
262
Page
263
Page
264
Page
265
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments