Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you, Andrew. This is…
davo:
Andrew, thanks for…
Andrew:
I doubt I will ever read the…
X. József:
You are right to fault the…
Evalsam:
Please reply to this “reply”…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10145
As Good Friday approaches, it is time once again to insist that theories of the atonement are a waste of space
Dana Ames → Andrew
:
Hi Andrew-
Yinka → Andrew
:
Rev. Andrew,
Mike Bull → Andrew
:
Hi there
Bob MacDonald → Andrew
:
From a layperson, a question.
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
You’re right, Andrew. I
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
If sin was such a big deal
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
It is only the story of
Andrew Sullivan on Jesus
Doug in CO → Andrew
:
If you would be open to doing
Andrew → Alex
:
Now you’re asking! I’m hoping
Alex → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Righteous Gentiles and their justification by works
Doug in CO → Andrew
:
If you haven’t done so, I
John Clements → Andrew
:
Sure, Andrew. I understand
Andrew → John Clements
:
The implication is that
John Clements → Andrew
:
I don’t think my comments
Andrew → John Clements
:
Righteousness is essentially
John Clements → Andrew
:
I am glad you picked up on
Andrew → Daniel
:
I don’t see why situations
Why I disagree with Tom Wright about the triumphal entry and divine kingship
Andrew → ps
:
Isn’t the answer to your
ps → Andrew
:
You did not convince me.
Evangelicalism, A new kind of
Doug in CO → Andrew
:
Part of the failure to
peter wilkinson → Daniel
:
Daniel,
Daniel → peter wilkinson
:
What is the object of faith,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
What is the object of faith,
Andrew → Phil Wood
:
Nice comment, thanks.
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
I would argue that Romans 3
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Gentiles cannot have been
Phil Wood → Andrew
:
Andrew, a splendid thoughtful
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
I would be happy to include
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Elegantly and clearly stated,
The Holy Spirit 5: The eschatological significance of Pentecost
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
This is where your whole
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
273
Page
274
Page
275
Page
276
Page
277
Page
278
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments