Recent comments

Comments found: 10108

Douglas Campbell and the right(eous)ness of God

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I agree that the presence or
Andrew → peter wilkinson: OK, let’s suppose that you
peter wilkinson → Andrew: There is far too much here to
Andrew → paulf: What does the second member
Andrew → peter wilkinson: 1. You’re right. The verb
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Andrew - I just stupidly
paulf → peter wilkinson: My last post was only
paulf → peter wilkinson: Or maybe Jesus was just a guy
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Peter, a few points
peter wilkinson → Andrew: It’s taking you a long time

Scripture as the (historical) theological interpretation of history

Jim Hoag → ScottL: Interesting discussion. And
ScottL → Andrew: Andrew - Thanks for your
Andrew → ScottL: Scott, I’m not sure I follow
ScottL → Andrew: Andrew - Would you say that

How does scripture speak to the world?

paulf → Andrew: The problem with Paul
Andrew → ScottL: Scott, I’ve written a piece
ScottL → Andrew: Or more to the point,
Paul Fromont → Andrew: Hey Andrew, thanks for being
Andrew → paulf: Paul, I’ve only got time for
paulf → Andrew: Andrew, you speak of

The prophetic relationship of the people of God to the “land”

Brian MacArevey → Andrew: Thanks Andrew, This was
ScottL → Andrew: Yes, it would be great to
Andrew → ScottL: Now that would have been a
ScottL → Andrew: You said: What now is the
Andrew → ScottL: The discussion is on page 91.
ScottL → Andrew: I had written a while back on

The community of the Beatitudes and the restoration of creation

Andrew → Brian MacArevey: No bother. I’ve tried to
Brian MacArevey → Brian MacArevey: Hey Andrew, I’m sorry I keep

Douglas Campbell and the wrath of God

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I used the phrase Jesus’s

New Perspective and Reformed theologies at a crossroads

Jim Hoag → Geoff Holsclaw: Andrew, DIAGRAMS!! What a
Subscribe to Recent comments