Recent comments

Comments found: 10209

The doctrine of the Second Coming and the restoration of the kingdom to Israel

peter wilkinson → Peter Simmonds: You must be getting tired
Peter Simmonds → peter wilkinson: A problem I would have with
peter wilkinson → Peter Simmonds: Romans 1 & 2 - We agree to
Peter Simmonds → peter wilkinson: Hi Peter,
peter wilkinson → Peter Simmonds: Well, there may be a little
Peter Simmonds → peter wilkinson: Right after saying there was
Peter Simmonds → peter wilkinson: Peter, I’m just not seeing
peter wilkinson → Peter Simmonds: Peter - I sent a reply to
Peter Simmonds → peter wilkinson: Peter, it seems you are
peter wilkinson → Peter Simmonds: I don’t think there’s any
Peter Simmonds → peter wilkinson: Hi Peter, I did read your
peter wilkinson → Peter Simmonds: If you go to the post on the
Peter Simmonds → peter wilkinson: Peter, I’m afraid I’m going
peter wilkinson → Peter Simmonds: I think this post is very
Peter Simmonds → Andrew: We can’t say for certain
Andrew → Stewart Felker: A good honest comment.
Peter Simmonds → Stewart Felker: Stewart, I think that’s a
Stewart Felker → Andrew: Will all due respect, I think

Should we “water down” the doctrine of the Second Coming?

peter wilkinson → Douglas Wilkinson: Thanks for all your comments
Douglas Wilkinson → Jerel Kratt: I think it is also worth
Andrew → Jerel Kratt: It was longer than your
Jerel Kratt → peter wilkinson: Peter forgive me one more
Jerel Kratt → peter wilkinson: Hi Peter.
Jerel Kratt → Andrew: You’re welcome, Andrew.
peter wilkinson → Jerel Kratt: Jeremy - your points are
Andrew → Jerel Kratt: Thanks for this, Jerel. I’ll
Jerel Kratt → Jerel Kratt: I accidentally omitted one
Jerel Kratt → peter wilkinson: Peter, if I may reply - I
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Andrew - your argument is

Off the map of the biblical narrative

Andrew → Wes Burnham: It’s a thought. It doesn’t
Subscribe to Recent comments