Recent comments

Comments found: 10184

Should we “water down” the doctrine of the Second Coming?

Andrew → Jerel Kratt: Thanks for this, Jerel. I’ll
Jerel Kratt → Jerel Kratt: I accidentally omitted one
Jerel Kratt → peter wilkinson: Peter, if I may reply - I
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Andrew - your argument is

Off the map of the biblical narrative

Andrew → Wes Burnham: It’s a thought. It doesn’t
Wes Burnham → Andrew: How do we know that we aren’t

New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about

peter wilkinson → Peter Simmonds: Richard - maybe you should
Peter Simmonds → Richard Worden Wilson: Richard, I actually think
peter wilkinson → peter wilkinson: Just correcting myself: Enns
Richard Worden Wilson → Andrew: I often wonder, when reading
peter wilkinson → Peter Simmonds: Thanks Peter. I agree that
Peter Simmonds → peter wilkinson: Hi Peter, I wasn’t referring
peter wilkinson → Peter Simmonds: Peter (Simmonds) - I think
Peter Simmonds → peter wilkinson: Peter, the issue I have with
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Useful to touch base and be

What Christmas teaches us about the gospel

Andrew → John Shakespeare : Thank you, John. Happy new
Andrew → Scott: Agreed. See this post, for
John Shakespeare → Andrew: Thank you, Andrew, for a year
Scott → Andrew: Andrew - Have you read Scot
Les Mayer → Andrew: Credit where credit is due
Andrew → Les Mayer: Thank you, Les. I shall try
Les Mayer → Andrew: Andrew, a good friend of mine

The message of the Bible in one sentence

Susanne Medina → Andrew: How can I get my creation to

The doctrine of the Trinity: less than the sum of the parts

peter wilkinson → Andrew: No, I’m not complaining, just
Andrew → peter wilkinson: It seems to me rather ironic
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I started to read the Fred

When is a dichotomy not a dichotomy? Tim Keller vs. Rachel Held Evans

Peter Simmonds → Andrew: Excellent post, and your last

Who are 'the least of these'?

Richard Worden Wilson → Andrew: Very well thought out and