Recent comments

Comments found: 10115

“Missio Dei” in historical perspectives, part 3

Andrew → Pete H: Pete, I’m not sure there’s
Pete H → Andrew: It seems to me that this

Digging for deeper meanings that don’t exist

Andrew → Doug Wilkinson: Hi Doug,My general argument
Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: By saying that folks in the
Andrew → Jerel Kratt: You’re right. I got hold of
Jerel Kratt → Andrew: Andrew,

Behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: the eschatology of Isaiah 60-66

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I don’t understand your first
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Why does Isaiah connect the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: In this case, new heavens and
Andrew → peter wilkinson: As I said before, you need to
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Isaiah is echoing Genesis 1:1
Jerel Kratt → Andrew: Andrew,
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Why far-fetched? Why shouldn
Andrew → Jerel Kratt: It was the Jerusalem above
Jerel Kratt → Andrew: I find it rather startling to
Jerel Kratt → Andrew: Andrew,
peter wilkinson → Andrew: So the language of Isaiah 65
Andrew → Doug Wilkinson: I would be more inclined to
Andrew → Jerel Kratt: I see the appeal of the
Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: It sounds like you are
Jerel Kratt → Andrew: “The “new creation” language

21 reasons why the coming of the kingdom of God was not the end of the world

davo → Andrew: Hi Andrew…
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I agree with your comment
Andrew → peter wilkinson: If we read Paul through a
Andrew → Peter: Thanks, Peter. It’s a good
Andrew → davo: Hi Davo.
davo → Andrew: My basic argument is that the
Peter → Andrew: I think you’re right that the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: The overarching issue I have

Postost-millennialism, or the end of eschatology as we know it

Andrew → David: These posts will give you
Subscribe to Recent comments