Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you, Andrew. This is…
davo:
Andrew, thanks for…
Andrew:
I doubt I will ever read the…
X. József:
You are right to fault the…
Evalsam:
Please reply to this “reply”…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10145
The “historical” Jesus is anything but gentle, meek and mild
Alex F → Andrew
:
Thank you for your work,
Philip Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson
:
Hey Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
You ignore my point: there is
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
So if Jesus tells a parable
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
So Jesus brought the old
Is “kingdom” in the New Testament the same as “kingdom” in the Old Testament?
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Responding to your points:
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
The “wrath of God” is a stock
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I think there was a mixture
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
I don’t see why we can’t say
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Jesus denounced the Pharisees
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Jesus, of course, was very
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
What I have described of the
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
In the case of Jerusalem, it
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
This is becoming one of those
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
1 Peter 2:9 doesn’t interpret
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
1 Peter 2:9 interprets Exodus
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Now therefore, if you will
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
The kingdom theme is an
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Yes, it’s stretching the
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
This is all a digression from
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Israel wasn’t really a
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Thanks Andree. I was
The message of the Bible in one sentence
aj → Andrew
:
“Love your neighbor as
Phyllis Bird on the authority of historical testimony
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Thanks. I’ll write something
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I concur with Phil’s comment
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew
:
Happy Thanksgiving back atcha
Digging for deeper meanings that don’t exist
Andrew → Doane
:
My understanding would be
Andrew → Rich
:
Well, I’m sorry to have
Rich → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Doane → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
113
Page
114
Page
115
Page
116
Page
117
Page
118
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments