Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

16 reasons for thinking that the conversion of the empire was at the heart of New Testament eschatology

peter wilkinson → Philip Ledgerwood: Thanks Phil. I do think one
Philip Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson: Well, it is that, too. I
peter wilkinson → Philip L Ledgerwood: This doesn’t sit well with
Philip L Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson: Hey Peter,
Mike Bull → Andrew: Good thoughts, but biblical
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Also, I agree with your 2nd
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I’m not sure he does. He
Andrew → peter wilkinson: On the point of “violent
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Usually by the time I have
Andrew → Peter: I’m not sure what evidence we

Is Jesus called “God” in Titus 2:13?

Marc Taylor → Andrew: Others have acted in the
Andrew → Marc Taylor: I presume BDAG includes Tit.
Marc Taylor → Andrew: Concerning Titus 2:13 the
Andrew → Marc Taylor: Excellent. That seems to
Jaco → Andrew: Thanks for a good article. Of
Marc Taylor → Andrew: Interesting article - thank

Talking Jesus: how does the Trinity fit in?

JT → Andrew: Well there it is. I am
Andrew → JT John Tancock: My argument is supported by

The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me? Part 1

Andrew → Travis Finley: By all means, provided the
Travis Finley → Andrew: AP,

The narrative-historical method—an outline

Andrew → Travis Finley: Similar. But we appear to
Travis Finley → Andrew: AP,

Was the garden of Eden an “archetypal sanctuary”?

Andrew → Travis Finley: Sorry, Travis, I don’t follow
Travis Finley → Travis Finley: “…Genesis 5 just shy of 1000.
Travis Finley → Andrew: AP,
Andrew → Travis Finley: I think we will have to agree
Travis Finley → Andrew: AP,

A conversation with Emi about salvation and mission

Philip L Ledgerwood → Emi: Hi Emi,
Emi → Philip Ledgerwood: Hi Phil,
Emi → Andrew: Hi Andrew,
Subscribe to Recent comments