Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

The strengths (and weaknesses) of the narrative-historical method

Keith → peter wilkinson: Fair enough Peter. Where
peter wilkinson → Andrew: So in short… he (Andrew)
Andrew → Daniel vR: Daniel, thanks for the
Daniel vR → Andrew: Hi Andrew,Following on from
Andrew → Bob MacDonald: David, of course, is not your
Andrew → Justin vR: Justin, that makes a lot of
Bob MacDonald → Andrew: What does the narrative
Justin vR → Andrew: Hey Andrew, great post. I

The Great (apocalyptic) Commission

Andrew → Rich: Fair enough. But why not
Rich → Andrew: AndrewThe problem I have with
Andrew → Rich: There is only one “end” in
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,Since Jesus tells his
Rich → Paul D.: heh heh heh…
Andrew → Michael Davis: Michael, one easy theme to
Michael Davis → Andrew: Old Testament ways of
Andrew → Michael Davis: Romans 1:8 is not really
Michael Davis → Andrew: It was proclaimed to the
Paul D. → Rich: Didn’t Augustine argue that
Andrew → Rich: Yes, you may be right.
Rich → Andrew: Andrew,How does the “Great

Keep telling the story, despite God and despite ourselves

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I can’t find it either. I
Andrew → peter wilkinson: If the question were raised
peter wilkinson → Andrew: The problem is, Peter, that
Fredrik → Andrew: I don’t think we can take
Andrew → Fredrik: Fredrik, my point is not that
Fredrik → Andrew: I suppose, calling Jesus a
Andrew → peter wilkinson: But does this validate all
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Lots to think about here.In

Discipleship means giving up everything to follow Jesus. Or does it?

Doug in CO → Andrew: A while back I asked some

Who else has argued that Gehenna is a place of historical judgment? I see one hand hesitantly raised

Tim Chambers → Mitchell Powell: You do have this from Wright:
Subscribe to Recent comments