Recent comments

Comments found: 10145

Keep telling the story, despite God and despite ourselves

Andrew → peter wilkinson: If the question were raised
peter wilkinson → Andrew: The problem is, Peter, that
Fredrik → Andrew: I don’t think we can take
Andrew → Fredrik: Fredrik, my point is not that
Fredrik → Andrew: I suppose, calling Jesus a
Andrew → peter wilkinson: But does this validate all
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Lots to think about here.In

Who else has argued that Gehenna is a place of historical judgment? I see one hand hesitantly raised

Tim Chambers → Mitchell Powell: You do have this from Wright:

What do we mean when we say that Jesus is Lord?

Andrew → Michael Davis: Michael, I wouldn’t say
Andrew → peter wilkinson: In fact, it would be more
Andrew → peter wilkinson: This is where the thesis
Andrew → Doug in CO: Doug, the point about the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: The narrative frame of this
Gerri → Andrew: Great Post. Thanks!
Michael Davis → Andrew: I think to put “lordship” in
Serex → Andrew: Thanks for the post
Doug in CO → Andrew: You might be right that
Andrew → Doug in CO: I’m not sure I follow your
Doug in CO → Andrew: Andrew,I have two problems

Does Paul say that Jesus is God in Romans 9:5?

Jaco → peter wilkinson: Not so sure about that… ;-)
John Doyle → John Doyle: As to whether God can be the
peter wilkinson → John Doyle: But we all know that Jesus is
John Doyle → Andrew: Here's a possible alternative

In the likeness of sinful flesh

Andrew → Daniel: I need to rush out to this
Daniel → Andrew: “The passage should not be
Andrew → peter wilkinson: My guess is that the Jesus
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I’m interested in the

Scot McKnight on the historical Jesus and the Jesus of the church

Andrew → Bruce Dayman: Thanks, Bruce—and for
Bruce Dayman → Andrew: Thanks for breaking this