Recent comments

Comments found: 10113

Evangelicals and the narrative-historical method: three questions

Hans → Andrew: Thank you, Andrew. My
peter wilkinson → Samuel Conner: I appreciated your thoughts
Andrew → Samuel Conner: Thank you. An excellent
Samuel Conner → Andrew: This is very helpful; thank

Ignorance about the ignorance of the Son

Roger Sacco → Samuel Conner: If Jesus was resurrected and
Samuel Conner → Andrew: Tom Wright’s “Jesus and the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Carlton Wynne isia useful

Why won’t there be marriage in the resurrection?

Phil L. → Andrew: Hmm. I see what you’re
doane → Andrew: Andrew,

What’s wrong with the “Romans Road” to salvation?

Richard Coplin → Andrew: The book of Romans does not

Why did the Jews accuse Jesus of making himself equal to God?

peter wilkinson → john: You could take a look at my
john → peter wilkinson: ” v.19; whatever the father
Andrew → Alex: I can see the sense in that
Alex → Andrew: What do you think of the

In the beginning was the Word, etc.

peter wilkinson → Andrew: And actually, rereading what
peter wilkinson → Andrew: The point might benefit from
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Whatever you make of the
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Yes, Logos probably refers in
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Your depersonalisation of
peter wilkinson → Andrew: There is no question that
Andrew → Chris: How would “the word became
Peter → Andrew: I’m not sure if you’d agree
Chris → Andrew: Can “Word became flesh”

Why does Jesus give the kingdom back in the end and become subject again to God?

Mike → peter wilkinson: You stated, “there was a time

Before Abraham was, I am

Andrew → Chris: Chris, I think there’s a lot
Chris → Andrew: The phrase could simply mean
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Maybe I could put it in terms
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Well, yes, it’s far less
Andrew → Helge seekamp: That’s nice. I share your
Peter → Andrew: Even though the author of the
Subscribe to Recent comments