Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Lee:
Nerva is recorded as the…
Lee:
Consider that IN HIS Olivet…
Elliot:
I do wonder why paul would…
Elliot:
Hi Andrew, so would you…
Thomas Howard:
Luke’s genealogy shows that…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10167
Just to be clear, I am neither a Preterist nor a Unitarian
Peter → Andrew
:
I know you say you are not
Jesus and the restoration of Israel according to Matthew
Peter → Andrew
:
I tend to agree with your
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Jesus never uses the word
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
It seems to me that the
Peter → Rich
:
If I understand Peter’s point
Rich → peter wilkinson
:
Peter,
peter wilkinson → Rich
:
Rich - the church isn’t
Rich → peter wilkinson
:
Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Are we talking past each
Rich → Andrew
:
Andrew,
Andrew → Rich
:
It can seem that way, but I
Rich → Andrew
:
Andrew & Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Despite what you say, and the
The message of the Bible in one sentence
Repeat → Andrew
:
This isn’t original to me;
What took us so long? G.B. Caird on the historical Jesus
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Thanks for drawing attention
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Phil Ledgerwood point out,
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
My first example, Matthew 3
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
It should be the other way
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
Well, you show me what Jesus
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
This is like Alice in
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
He evidently didn’t think he
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
“What Jesus thought” is
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
It is in fact the rest of the
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
I don’t think you can
Andrew → Matt Hartke
:
I’ll have a look.
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
I think if you read chapter 8
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Actual history bears out the
Matt Hartke → Andrew
:
Andrew, have you ever read
Was Gehenna a burning rubbish dump, and does it matter?
Bill Ectric → Andrew
:
From what I’ve read about
Why does Jesus give the kingdom back in the end and become subject again to God?
Bonnie → peter wilkinson
:
The question was, How was he
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
117
Page
118
Page
119
Page
120
Page
121
Page
122
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments