Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

What took us so long? G.B. Caird on the historical Jesus

Andrew → peter wilkinson: Actual history’s one thing.
peter wilkinson → Andrew: If Wright acknowledged his
Andrew → Philip Ledgerwood: Yes, quotation marks would
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew: As I say constantly to my
Andrew → Philip Ledgerwood: Ah, yes, you’re right, thanks
Philip Ledgerwood → Andrew: For what it’s worth, I read:

Postost-millennialism, or the end of eschatology as we know it

Andrew → maintenanceman: Let’s see if this helps.1. No
maintenanceman → Andrew: Hi Andrew, thanks for the
Andrew → maintenanceman: It may help (let me know if
maintenanceman → Andrew: Hi Andrew, If possible could
Andrew → Doug Wilkinson: Well, the martyrs reign with
Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: I think this whole field of
Andrew → Doug Wilkinson: I think this focuses too much
Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: I think the error in your
Andrew → Doug Wilkinson: Good comment.My argument
Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: If the collapse of
Andrew → Doug Wilkinson: 1. If we read forward from
Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: I think I agree with you as
Andrew → Doug Wilkinson: The diagram is an
Andrew → Jerel Kratt: Here are a few posts. But it
Doug Wilkinson → Andrew: Where does a recently
Jerel Kratt → Andrew: I’d like to see more
Doane → Andrew: The PostMill community in

The Nashville Statement and the future of the church

Andrew → Richard Worden Wilson: That’s a good point, though I
Andrew → Richard Worden Wilson: Perhaps, but the historical
peter wilkinson → Richard Worden Wilson: I was wondering which last
Richard Worden Wilson → Andrew: Oddly enough, I haven’t seen
Richard Worden Wilson → peter wilkinson: I affirm Andrew’s affirmation
Richard Worden Wilson → Andrew: Ah, but perhaps, the

Neither the prince of Tyre nor the king of Babylon is Satan

Stacey Cooper → Andrew: King of Tyre/Lucifer is
Subscribe to Recent comments