Recent comments

Comments found: 10145

Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method

Andrew → Phil L.: Thanks for the link. A very
Phil L. → Andrew: I started:
Andrew → Phil L.: Thanks for this, Phil. Some
Andrew → Samuel Conner: I try not to think about it
Andrew → Scott: Sadly not.
Scott → Andrew: Andrew, is there an American
Samuel Conner → Andrew: Thanks, Andrew. The recent
Phil L. → Andrew: Great summaries, Andrew.

Come out of her, my people…

Andrew → Scott: If Jesus’s substitutionary
Scott → Andrew: It’s almost as if there is no
Arthur Davis → Andrew: Thanks for this one Andrew.
James Mercer → Andrew: I recommend we start by
Andrew → Kent Haley: That’s difficult to answer
Andrew → Samuel Conner: Alone in the wilderness is
Kent Haley → Andrew: Interesting…
Phil L. → Andrew: This was a welcome call to
Samuel Conner → Andrew: Thank you, Andrew. This is

The deity of Jesus, the war against Rome, and theology (of the cross) as a hermeneutical tool

Ted Hopkins → Andrew: I will undoubtedly respond

Biblical scholar says that COVID-19 is not an “act of God”. Is he right?

Andrew → Ted Hopkins: Thanks for the clarification
Rob Bright → Andrew: I like Dr. Michael Heiser’s
Ted Hopkins → Andrew: I can see your confusion,
Andrew → Ted Hopkins: Thanks, Ted. I appreciate
Ted Hopkins → Andrew: Just found this blog today.
Andrew → Stephen Dintaman: Very well said. Thank you.
Stephen Dintaman → Andrew: I have been bothered for some
Andrew → JE: Indeed it is.

All the world’s the stage: a narrative-historical revision of Wright’s five act play hermeneutic

Andrew → Edwin: I couldn’t work out what Acts
Edwin → Andrew: This is fascinating. Would it

Scot McKnight, Matthew Bates, and Greg Gilbert on the gospel

Andrew → Kent Haley: Not Scot. I hear from Matthew
Kent Haley → Andrew: Andrew,
Subscribe to Recent comments