Recent comments

Comments found: 10112

Some thoughts on the opening paragraph of Donald Hagner’s How New is the New Testament?

peter wilkinson → Andrew: I’m slightly concerned about
Miguel de Servet → Andrew: The contrast between law and

Donald Hagner’s “interpretive dilemma” that isn’t a dilemma

Miguel de Servet → Phil L.: Thank you Phil, you are very
Andrew → Miguel de Servet: It looks like you were using
Phil L. → Miguel de Servet: Huh. I wonder what it is
Helge seekamp → Miguel de Servet: As Crüsemann explains I his
Miguel de Servet → Andrew: But then why, Hagner asks,

Christ died for whose sins in accordance with the scriptures?

HMarie → Bob MacDonald: “The wages of sin , is death”

When Jesus goes off message: the righteous will shine like the sun

Miguel de Servet → Andrew: … what happens to the “saints
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Not so much funny but
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Sorry, just to be clear here,
Andrew → Phil L.: Yes, very funny!
Andrew → peter wilkinson: I know you’ve bowed out, but
Phil L. → peter wilkinson: Oh, I just thought it was
peter wilkinson → Phil Ledgerwood: Phil: what goes round comes
Phil Ledgerwood → peter wilkinson: When I first saw you brought
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Forms of the verb “live” are
Andrew → peter wilkinson: It is said of Jesus in
peter wilkinson → Andrew: If they’re on earth, I expect
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Fair question. I assume that

Why traditional eschatology is a failure of nerve

Miguel de Servet → Andrew: More “last day”, actually.
Andrew → Miguel de Servet: I mean what in the Bible is

Testing times: a narrative framework for the renewal of the Western church

Miguel de Servet → Andrew: 1. What would not be
Andrew → Miguel de Servet: 1. That’s true. But why

Why won’t there be marriage in the resurrection?

Miguel de Servet → Eric Breaux: See my previous comment. I do
Eric Breaux → Miguel de Servet: Jesus appeals to the

Stephen Burnhope: Atonement and the New Perspective

Andrew → Stephen Burnhope: Stephen, thanks for taking