Recent comments

Comments found: 10182

When the “restoration of all things” is not the restoration of all things

Miguel de Servet → Andrew: See my response to Alex [@
Andrew → Miguel de Servet: See my response to Alex, who
Miguel de Servet → Andrew: I don’t know where Hagner got
John Shakespeare → Samuel Conner: We shall probably get a
Samuel Conner → Andrew: Thank you; this is helpful.

Donald Hagner’s “interpretive dilemma” that isn’t a dilemma

Andrew → Alex : Indeed, this is the conundrum
Alex → Andrew: How would you say Jesus
Phil Ledgerwood → Miguel de Servet: Hey Miguel,
Miguel de Servet → Phil L.: Thank you Phil, you are very
Andrew → Miguel de Servet: It looks like you were using
Phil L. → Miguel de Servet: Huh. I wonder what it is
Helge seekamp → Miguel de Servet: As Crüsemann explains I his
Miguel de Servet → Andrew: But then why, Hagner asks,

Some thoughts on the opening paragraph of Donald Hagner’s How New is the New Testament?

Miguel de Servet → peter wilkinson: Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I’m slightly concerned about
Miguel de Servet → Andrew: The contrast between law and

Stephen Burnhope: Atonement and the New Perspective

Stephen Burnhope → Andrew: Again, thank you Andrew. I

Christ died for whose sins in accordance with the scriptures?

HMarie → Andrew: Rightly dividing the word, is
HMarie → Andrew: Rightly dividing the word, is
HMarie → Bob MacDonald: “The wages of sin , is death”
HMarie → Andrew: “The wages of sin , is death”

When Jesus goes off message: the righteous will shine like the sun

Miguel de Servet → Andrew: … what happens to the “saints
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Not so much funny but
Andrew → peter wilkinson: Sorry, just to be clear here,
Andrew → Phil L.: Yes, very funny!
Andrew → peter wilkinson: I know you’ve bowed out, but

Why traditional eschatology is a failure of nerve

Miguel de Servet → Andrew: More “last day”, actually.
Andrew → Miguel de Servet: I mean what in the Bible is

Testing times: a narrative framework for the renewal of the Western church

Miguel de Servet → Andrew: 1. What would not be

Why won’t there be marriage in the resurrection?

Miguel de Servet → Eric Breaux: See my previous comment. I do
Subscribe to Recent comments