Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Samuel Conner:
Thank you Andrew. Perhaps…
Ron Macy:
Don’t forget the most direct…
Ron Macy:
Peter Wilkinson, I apologize…
Jerry:
Satan’s little season and…
Alpha Kamara:
Your illustration says it…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10182
If they do these things when the wood is green, what will happen when it is dry?
Samuel Conner → Miguel de Servet
:
Underconstrained data sets
Miguel de Servet → Samuel Conner
:
It seems to me that in every
Samuel Conner → Miguel de Servet
:
It seems to me that in every
Miguel de Servet → Samuel Conner
:
This is again highly
Miguel de Servet → Samuel Conner
:
A “necessity” that is brought
Samuel Conner → Miguel de Servet
:
re: “… that the passion and
Miguel de Servet → Andrew
:
@ Andrew
Austin → Andrew
:
andrew,
Samuel Conner → Samuel Conner
:
This is again highly
Samuel Conner → Andrew
:
re: “Is it really plausible
Andrew → Miguel de Servet
:
1. I see the vertical story
Andrew → Samuel Conner
:
It’s difficult for me to
Miguel de Servet → Andrew
:
Andrew, with the premise that
Samuel Conner → Andrew
:
My thinking has been strongly
Andrew → Samuel Conner
:
I wonder whether it might
Phil Ledgerwood → Samuel Conner
:
There’s not a built in way to
Samuel Conner → Andrew
:
Thank you! This is helpful.
When the “restoration of all things” is not the restoration of all things
Miguel de Servet → Phil L.
:
I have to say, Andrew’s
Phil L. → Miguel de Servet
:
Those translations all seem
Miguel de Servet → Phil L.
:
My comment on supersessionism
Miguel de Servet → Phil L.
:
Paul speaks of:
Phil L. → Miguel de Servet
:
(1.) It was wise to abandon
Phil L. → Miguel de Servet
:
Here’s one example:
Miguel de Servet → Samuel Conner
:
@ Samuel Conner
Samuel Conner → Miguel de Servet
:
It may border on hubris for
Miguel de Servet → Andrew
:
1. It was wise to abandon the
Andrew → Miguel de Servet
:
2. I would say that it is
Miguel de Servet → Andrew
:
Oh, BTW, speaking of
Miguel de Servet → Andrew
:
1. No, supersessionism is not
Andrew → Miguel de Servet
:
1. Is supersessionism an
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
77
Page
78
Page
79
Page
80
Page
81
Page
82
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Some of the things I do and why
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments