Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

If they do these things when the wood is green, what will happen when it is dry?

Phil Ledgerwood → Samuel Conner: There’s not a built in way to
Samuel Conner → Andrew: Thank you! This is helpful.

When the “restoration of all things” is not the restoration of all things

Miguel de Servet → Phil L.: I have to say, Andrew’s
Phil L. → Miguel de Servet: Those translations all seem
Miguel de Servet → Phil L.: My comment on supersessionism
Miguel de Servet → Phil L.: Paul speaks of:
Phil L. → Miguel de Servet: (1.) It was wise to abandon
Phil L. → Miguel de Servet: Here’s one example:
Miguel de Servet → Samuel Conner: @ Samuel Conner
Samuel Conner → Miguel de Servet: It may border on hubris for
Miguel de Servet → Andrew: 1. It was wise to abandon the
Andrew → Miguel de Servet: 2. I would say that it is
Miguel de Servet → Andrew: Oh, BTW, speaking of
Miguel de Servet → Andrew: 1. No, supersessionism is not
Andrew → Miguel de Servet: 1. Is supersessionism an
Miguel de Servet → Andrew: See my response to Alex [@
Andrew → Miguel de Servet: See my response to Alex, who
Miguel de Servet → Andrew: I don’t know where Hagner got
John Shakespeare → Samuel Conner: We shall probably get a
Samuel Conner → Andrew: Thank you; this is helpful.

Donald Hagner’s “interpretive dilemma” that isn’t a dilemma

Andrew → Alex : Indeed, this is the conundrum
Alex → Andrew: How would you say Jesus
Phil Ledgerwood → Miguel de Servet: Hey Miguel,
Miguel de Servet → Phil L.: Thank you Phil, you are very
Andrew → Miguel de Servet: It looks like you were using
Phil L. → Miguel de Servet: Huh. I wonder what it is
Helge seekamp → Miguel de Servet: As Crüsemann explains I his

Some thoughts on the opening paragraph of Donald Hagner’s How New is the New Testament?

Miguel de Servet → peter wilkinson: Peter,
peter wilkinson → Andrew: I’m slightly concerned about

Stephen Burnhope: Atonement and the New Perspective

Stephen Burnhope → Andrew: Again, thank you Andrew. I
Subscribe to Recent comments