Skip to main content
Menu
P.OST
How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference
Recent comments
Andrew:
From where do you get the…
Jay Riszio:
The Hebrew word incorrectly…
Glen Ferro:
Actually you can read the…
Sean Kasabuske:
“By keeping the article on…
ADAM THE 1ST:
The exact same phrase (ego…
more
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Why you should get some theological (by which I really mean biblical) education
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments
Comments found: 10209
The doctrine of the Trinity: less than the sum of the parts
Peter → Phil L.
:
I think it’s unlikely Targum
Phil L. → Peter
:
I wonder which is the chicken
Peter → Alex
:
I just stumbled on this
Does the narrative-historical method distort New Testament christology?
Phil L. → peter wilkinson
:
I am very sorry about Brexit,
peter wilkinson → Phil L.
:
I seem to be conducting
peter wilkinson → Andrew
:
Thanks for the clarification.
Phil L. → peter wilkinson
:
I can appreciate that.
Andrew → peter wilkinson
:
I differ in some key respects
peter wilkinson → peter wilkinson
:
When I greeted you as “John”,
peter wilkinson → Phil L.
:
And it’s always also good to
Phil L. → peter wilkinson
:
Hey Peter, good to see you.
peter wilkinson → Phil L.
:
Phil - the logic of your
Peter → deon
:
The “I am” argument will get
Phil L. → Alex
:
That’s a good point.
Alex → Phil L.
:
The Gospel and the Epistles
Phil L. → Alex
:
Interestingly, no less a
Alex → Andrew
:
There is no apocalyptic
Alex → deon
:
Christ’s claims about himself
deon → deon
:
To correct myself He didn’t
Phil L. → deon
:
Your belief in the divinity
Jesus as Alpha and Omega, first and last, beginning and end
Peter → deon
:
I could be wrong, but my
Peter → deon
:
Regarding Acts 7, Stephen was
Phil L. → deon
:
You might want to read your
deon → Peter
:
Are you familiar with any of
deon → Peter
:
Thanks for responding. I am
Peter → deon
:
I think you’re reading way
deon → Peter
:
You responded to my post and
Tim Keller gets a lot right but gets hell badly wrong
Brian Dockery → Phil L.
:
Phil,
Phil L. → Brian Dockery
:
Hi Brian,
Brian Dockery → Andrew
:
While I don’t want to base
Pagination
First page
« First
Previous page
‹‹
…
Page
93
Page
94
Page
95
Page
96
Page
97
Page
98
…
Next page
››
Last page
Last »
Subscribe to Recent comments
HOME
Content
All content
All comments
Index of Bible references
Theological terms in narrative-historical perspective
Podcasts and videos
Book and article reviews
Index of charts
Auf Deutsch
Romans
Method
The “narrative-historical” method according to ChatGPT
The narrative premise of a post-Christendom theology
Answers to questions about the narrative-historical method
New year, new attempt to explain what this blog is all about
Could you please help me understand the practical consequences…?
The narrative-historical method—an outline
Some rough and ready “rules” for doing a narrative-historical reading of the New Testament
The narrative-historical reading of the New Testament: what’s in it for me?
About
Andrew Perriman
Why you should get some theological (by which I really mean biblical) education
Books
Contact me
Privacy policy
Follow
Get updates by email
On Facebook
On X
On Bluesky
On Threads
Feedly
RSS
Archive
Search
Recent comments