Recent comments

Comments found: 10167

Does the narrative-historical method distort New Testament christology?

Peter → deon: The “I am” argument will get
Phil L. → Alex: That’s a good point.
Alex → Phil L.: The Gospel and the Epistles
Phil L. → Alex: Interestingly, no less a
Alex → Andrew: There is no apocalyptic
Alex → deon: Christ’s claims about himself
deon → deon: To correct myself He didn’t
Phil L. → deon: Your belief in the divinity
deon → Alex: I see why you would say that.
deon → Phil L.: “This is ambiguous because it
deon → Andrew: Ah, I see. That takes me
deon → Peter: No.
Phil L. → deon: Hey deon,
Andrew → deon: What makes John’s narrative
Peter → deon: deon,Does Word=God mean Word
Alex → Andrew: I would say, many would agree

Jesus as Alpha and Omega, first and last, beginning and end

Peter → deon: I could be wrong, but my
Peter → deon: Regarding Acts 7, Stephen was
Phil L. → deon: You might want to read your
deon → Peter: Are you familiar with any of
deon → Peter: Thanks for responding. I am
Peter → deon: I think you’re reading way
deon → Peter: You responded to my post and
Peter → deon: Deon, you are coming at the
deon → Peter: “The Jews already had stones
Peter → deon: The Jews already had stones
deon → deon: But we can definitely agree

Tim Keller gets a lot right but gets hell badly wrong

Brian Dockery → Phil L.: Phil,
Phil L. → Brian Dockery: Hi Brian,
Brian Dockery → Andrew: While I don’t want to base
Subscribe to Recent comments