Recent comments

Comments found: 10182

The “patriarchy paradox”: why both complementarians and egalitarians may have got it wrong (and right)

Andrew → Malcolm Smith: Malcolm, the second part
Malcolm Smith → Andrew: “Traditionalists or

Does the narrative-historical method distort New Testament christology?

peter wilkinson → Phil L.: It’s not going to be possible
Phil L. → peter wilkinson: I am very sorry about Brexit,
peter wilkinson → Phil L.: I seem to be conducting
peter wilkinson → Andrew: Thanks for the clarification.
Phil L. → peter wilkinson: I can appreciate that.
Andrew → peter wilkinson: I differ in some key respects
peter wilkinson → peter wilkinson: When I greeted you as “John”,
peter wilkinson → Phil L.: And it’s always also good to
Phil L. → peter wilkinson: Hey Peter, good to see you.
peter wilkinson → Phil L.: Phil - the logic of your
Peter → deon: The “I am” argument will get
Phil L. → Alex: That’s a good point.
Alex → Phil L.: The Gospel and the Epistles
Phil L. → Alex: Interestingly, no less a
Alex → Andrew: There is no apocalyptic
Alex → deon: Christ’s claims about himself

The doctrine of the Trinity: less than the sum of the parts

Peter → Phil L.: I think it’s unlikely Targum
Phil L. → Peter: I wonder which is the chicken
Peter → Alex: I just stumbled on this

Jesus as Alpha and Omega, first and last, beginning and end

Peter → deon: I could be wrong, but my
Peter → deon: Regarding Acts 7, Stephen was
Phil L. → deon: You might want to read your
deon → Peter: Are you familiar with any of
deon → Peter: Thanks for responding. I am
Peter → deon: I think you’re reading way

Tim Keller gets a lot right but gets hell badly wrong

Brian Dockery → Phil L.: Phil,
Phil L. → Brian Dockery: Hi Brian,
Brian Dockery → Andrew: While I don’t want to base
Subscribe to Recent comments