Recent comments

Comments found: 10145

Does the narrative-historical method distort New Testament christology?

deon → Andrew: Ah, I see. That takes me
deon → Peter: No.
Phil L. → deon: Hey deon,
Andrew → deon: What makes John’s narrative
Peter → deon: deon,Does Word=God mean Word
Alex → Andrew: I would say, many would agree
deon → Samuel Conner: The beauty of God, to me, is
Samuel Conner → deon: No confusion; our remarks are
deon → deon: Samuel to be clear my reply
deon → Andrew: Why would you leave out that
Samuel Conner → Andrew: I was quite surprised to

Jesus as Alpha and Omega, first and last, beginning and end

Peter → deon: The Jews already had stones
deon → deon: But we can definitely agree
deon → Peter: I went back to reread just in
Peter → deon: They were going to stone him
deon → Peter: I agree as will virtually
Peter → deon: deon, Christians like to use
Andrew → deon: Hi. Thanks for all of this.
Andrew → Alex: Perhaps Jesus is the first of
deon → deon: Also, I just want to be clear
deon → Andrew: I’ve read a quite a few posts
Alex → Andrew: Revelation 1:18 and 2:8 seem

unPodcast: Does the narrative-historical method help us to answer the question “Why be a Christian?”

Richard Worden Wilson → Andrew: Very well done. Despite my

More on the new Jerusalem in the midst of the nations

Peter Wilkinson → Andrew: Just as an aside, Bradley
davo → Andrew: Andrew… it might simply be
peter wilkinson → Andrew: It’s an interesting idea,
Andrew → davo: But in one case the wicked

Why does Jesus give the kingdom back in the end and become subject again to God?

Tony Conrad → peter wilkinson: I think you somehow make it

What was the most important lesson that the early church learned from Jesus?

Andrew → Keith Wansbrough: Thanks, Keith. I’ve fixed it.
Keith Wansbrough → Andrew: The “no atonement as such”
Subscribe to Recent comments